Pros and Cons of the ObamaCare Replacement Plan AKA TrumpCare

The Pros and Cons of the ObamaCare Replacement AKA the Pros and Cons of TrumpCare (as found in the The American Health Care Act)

We present a simple list of the pros and cons of the ObamaCare Replacement plan (as found in the The American Health Care Act) that some call TrumpCare.

The point of this list is to give you the bare bones basics from a centered perspective (thus some will see the pros as cons and cons as pros, but the list will work to inform). See our review of the American HealthCare Act for more information.

UPDATE 2019: This plan was never passed, thus most of this information is now only historically relevant. With that said, aspects of this plan were passed via executive order, Congress, and to some extent the courts… thus it does have relevance in that way as well.

TIP: The aim of Ryan and Trump is to pass this bill through a process in which only 60 votes will be needed in the Senate. This means they can’t do a full repeal and can only go after provisions that require funding. Given this, treating the idea that it isn’t a full repeal as a pro or a con is beside the point.

The Pros of TrumpCare / ObamaCare Repeal and Replace / American Health Care Act

  • The bill gets rid of the fee for not having insurance (it doesn’t get rid of the mandate, it just gets rid of the fee).
  • The bill keeps many of ObamaCare’s provisions. It doesn’t keep all the provisions, but this round keeps essential health benefits (except for Medicaid and it repeals the defined actuarial values which could make minimal essential coverage meaningless), lifetime and annual limits, preexisting conditions exclusions, and tons of the little improvements that the ACA made. It only goes after a few provisions: Tax Credits and out-of-pocket cost assistance, the employer and individual mandate, and Medicaid expansion.
  • The bill freezes and starts to defund Medicaid; it doesn’t defund Medicaid or Medicaid Expansion. This means there would be wiggle room for both Republicans (to get re-elected) and Democrats (to push for expansion again).
  • The bill helps those making over the 400% poverty level ($47,520 for an individual and$97,200 for a family of four in 2016) by expanding HSAs and providing a tax credit based on age. This really does help that lower-upper class / middle class (depending on region and perspective) who aren’t already covered through their employer.
  • The bill eases the tax burden on industry and large employers (not small employers), if trickle down works, get out your buckets because it is going to be raining. If it doesn’t, then this is probably a con unless you invest in or work for or own specific types of healthcare companies (like device maker or drug maker).
  • The bill does some interesting things like block-grant Medicaid, allow the selling of insurance over state lines, reduce litigation in healthcare, and create a sick pool. All these can be big cons if not implemented well or if you are anti-entitlement. They could be negatives if used as a tool to starve programs for the sick and poor through defunding over time, but they could be positives if they are properly funded.
  • The bill might reduce the cost of plans by easing requirements and letting insurers sell across state lines (although that would mean more “junk insurance” and fewer consumer protections).

The Cons of TrumpCare / ObamaCare Repeal and Replace / American Health Care Act

  • The plan hurts the sick, poor, and women, is a wash for the healthy middle class and helps the upper tiers, large employers, and industry. The movement right calls this “picking winners and losers,” the left calls it “trickle down oligarchy,” the center might say “at least we didn’t get single payer or Rand’s plan.” Still, it really does shift tax breaks/credit from the bottom to the top.
  • The bill defunds Planned Parenthood by making it so it can’t take Medicaid (which is a con unless you are have a strong ideological view; but remember, Planned Parenthood is taking Medicaid for non-abortions related services, funding abortions with tax dollars is already illegal aside as allowed for by Hyde).
  • The bill doesn’t seek universal coverage, and the uninsured rate will increase over time.
  • The bill charges people 30% more for 12 months if they have a lapse in coverage for more than 63 days. This means that people who can’t afford coverage due to cost will have an extra cost barrier. Is this better or worse than the mandate? Probably better in some respects, especially for a selection of our 320 million, but it raises some obvious complications like “why would a young person enter the market?”
  • The bill doesn’t incentivize healthy people to enter the market. Sure, most get their coverage through work or Medicare, but many young people will likely wait to get covered.
  • The bill gets rid of the employer mandate, that is great for employers and employees who got expensive employer plans, but that isn’t great for those who relied on employer coverage. Fewer employers providing coverage means more burden on the state to provide assistance.
  • This bill changes the way minimal essential coverage is defined and applied. It repeals the definitions of plan levels (Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum) deregulating the insurers need to meet specific actuarial values. It also repeals the requirement for Medicaid to provide minimal essential coverage. Essentially, it’s not clear what minimal essential coverage is in this framework.
  • The bill can’t possibly reduce the deficit without deep cuts, as it shifts costs and gets rid of taxes (so it spends but decreases revenue). The CBO report isn’t done, but I don’t see how it could be fiscally conservative, pas CBO reports have suggested this sort of plan won’t decrease costs. See for example: How Repealing Portions of the Affordable Care Act Would Affect Health Insurance Coverage and Premiums. UPDATE: It is projected to reduce the deficit nominally over 10 years according to the CBO, but it does this by cutting Medicaid expansion and cost assistance which one can reasonably consider “deep cuts.”
  • The bill changes tax credits to age-based credits and gets rid of out-of-pocket assistance and freezes Medicaid Expansion. So it shifts assistance from the poorest to higher incomes (skipping the middle class in the process). This helps those over 400% of the poverty level and mostly hurts those below it. This should be weighed against the mandate. Those who don’t want coverage will save the fee from the mandate.
  • The bill ignores every idea by any liberal or conservative except Paul Ryan and his crew. It includes a lot of tweaks to the old “Better Way” plan that seem to aim at appeasing Trump and centered liberals and conservatives, but it doesn’t include any ideas that Bernie came up with or even that the Kochs would want. It favors industry and employers, but in a Ryan way and not in another way. It doesn’t even really look to Pence’s plan or Price’s plan much (for better or worse).
  • It doesn’t address many sticking points that ObamaCare had. It implements an ideological plan with some concessions. For example, those who stuck in the Medicaid gap or struggling with out-of-pocket costs will have fewer options, not more. There may be cheaper plans coming out, but affordability will still be an issue.

The Bottom Line

The bottom line is that this isn’t all good or all bad from any perspective, it fixes a few ObamaCare sticking points and creates new sticking points.

Author: Thomas DeMichele

Thomas DeMichele is the head writer and founder of,, and other websites. He has been in the health insurance and healthcare information field since 2012. is a...

Leave a comment

We'll never share your email with anyone else.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This is what happens when we look to our govt for everything. Obamacare was the begining of major overreach into our healthcare decisions. There is way too much power and money involved now to make them stop interfering. I am here looking for affordable healthcare and I just cannot get past the preambles with all of the bias against the GOP. It is sad to be such tools as if Obama ever ever did anything anything positive. We never wanted gov control but here we are. The only time anyone talks about cost is when it is about the opposite party. We are in a mess because of radical thinking.


I am single & cannot afford health insurance because I am working part time, it is hard to find a full time job. Companies are hiring only PART TIME so they do not have to pay for health insurance. This is a HUGE Problem! Part time only pays for rent-nothing else. I am 58 years old so no one wants to hire me which makes matters worse. I am just over by a few dollars to collect Medicaid. The Government should make it possible to provide health insurance for everyone! Everyone needs health insurance! When I don’t feel well I can’t even see a doctor. Please help me and others like me to be able to receive health insurance. Thank you!


I would like to comment on this, healthcare is not fair to any and all of the land. My daughter is having foot surgery today and before this could take place she and her husband had to pay the deductible of 3700.00 before the procedure would take place. This exhausted their saving. They have a major insurance, but this had to be met before. Another person we know had a Bariatrics procedure and are low income, so this 80,000 dollar procedure was done for a total out of pocket expense for them was a whopping 40.00. So basicly what we the people are saying is that we need to acheive a better balance of the system. Subsidies for some and not all is very unfair. Also just as all have a choice, you have chosen your path. We need to be more responsible for our own actions, not blame others or the government.


As long as it is called Obama Care or Trump Care, all action or inaction is nothing more than OUR representatives playing a political GAME with everyone’s healthcare.
The Affordable Care Act has been in place for 7 years now. Long enough to know what is working and what is not. It makes no logical sense to toss it all out “politically” and start over with a new plan that will take another 7 years to know what works and what don’t.
We were once the greatest nation in the world and we cannot afford not to have good health care available to all citizens. A nation of unwell citizens is an unhealthy nation!
Make sensible changes and adjustments to current healthcare. To start with a totally new plan is political foolishness!


Sincerely The Law Has Several Negative Impacts On USA Citizenz And The World At Large As We Cant Do Anything Against It And…..


I am terrified at the implications of this bill for the poor. I work hard and I have a Bachelor’s degree, but I do not make more than $20,000 a year. As a young woman about to get married and start a family, I need all the help I can get and Medicaid has been a life-saver. If Trump’s bill is really going to favor the rich (yes, $47520 annually counts as being rich. The family of 6 I grew up in never made more than $70,000, but we’ve never gone hungry), then my family, myself, and many people I know that are spending their time strengthening this country through non-profits and AmeriCorps programs… we’re all going to be in a heap of trouble, simply for being unselfish with our lives and time.


I want to know if you are already over the age of 65 and receiving Medicare & are in low income bracket getting extra help will this age group be affected …?


Is there ANY information as to what health services would actually be covered under Trumpcare? I cannot find anywhere an outline of specific services that an insured can depend on when going to the doctor, hospital, clinic, or having lab work, tests, therapies, chronic illness maintenance. Where is this information or does it not exist? It’s obvious most of American’s will be losers but there is no discussion about services covered so people can see what this is really about. We need specifics not rhetoric.


I think the American care act should be called Republicare and not trumpcare so when it fails the American people we will all know who to blame.


The media of course will jump all over this if Trump cannot pass his health care bill, but the average American has come to realize that the news is bought and paid for, as it were. Obama Care had a great idea. …But from a financial point of view, it had the propensity to eventually crash the system. I’ve taken economic classes recently where we’ve followed this subject in detail, so although as a mother and grandmother I cringed at the list of what services were on the chopping block ( pregnancy, medicaid, mental health, etc. ), I knew that these fundamental services could, under “good management”, essentially become less of a drain on the economy. But would we have good management? Who actually runs our entire health care system today are the HMO’s, in bed with big pharm, which legally operates without any cap. This IS our problem. So if we start there, real solutions can made.


smh give me some health insurance LMAO


The penalty for uninsured (re-)entering the market should be noted – insurance companies allowed to charge them 30% more.


The fact that low income citizens will be impacted by rising price or cessation of coverage is a travesty. The fact that this is based on age and not income offers tax credits for older citizens who make enough money that they really don’t need the credit and turns away from lower income citizens who actually need the help and coverage.


I would agree save for one point of reference; POTUS campaign promise to resuscitate job growth. We need place our judgements on hold and remind ourselves that if Trump makes good on his job growth promise then heath care insurance will nothing more than just another monthly bill paid out from our checking acct, not free hay from the barn that dolled out by the good shepherd hands.

Ask yourself whether your aware that there are two, and only two ways to drive an economy. 1. Choice, by way of the market; free enterprise, 2. By way of the state. Think of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, VA. Does any of those .gov administered programs leave you with a sense of trust that they know what the hell their doing? Eight years of Obama like the pied piper has led more people to the ever growing .gov assistance handout lines. Why? Simple. No jobs! Bureaucratic redtape, NAFTA, and tough corporate regulations, forced large company’s to leave the US taking with them our much JOBS! For 8 long years, his M.O. remained unchanged. Those who had to depend on .gov assistance for support, here a news flash! New entitlements, more handouts just made you more dependent and enslaved. That’s not freedom! Dependency is a form of slavery. They call the shots, they control your lives.

Listen, let’s try this. Put away our ideological presuppositions until after his term in office.Afterwards, then we’ll look at the numbers to see what the record shows.

ObamaCareFacts is a free informational site. It's privately owned, and is not owned, operated, or endorsed by the US federal government or state governments. Our contributors have over a decade of experience writing about health insurance. However, we do not offer professional official legal, tax, or medical advice. See: Legal Information and Cookie Policy. For more on our company, learn About or Contact us.