Supreme Court Seems to Side With ObamaCare in Hearing

The Supreme Court appears to be siding with ObamaCare in today’s hearing, as most comments from the Justices implied ObamaCare should be able to stand without the mandate.[1]

Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who argued against ObamaCare, tried to make the claim that the mandate (which was reduced to $0 in 2019 due to previous actions by Congress) was “inseverable” from ObamaCare.

However, the Justices pushed back on that logic.

For example, Kavanaugh said there is a “very straightforward case” for severability under the court’s precedents, and Roberts said, “I think it’s hard for you to argue that Congress intended the entire act to fall if the mandate was struck down when the same Congress that lowered the penalty to zero did not even try to repeal the rest of the act,” Roberts said to Hawkins. “I think frankly, they wanted the court to do that. But that’s not our job.”

In other words, it appears that the Supreme Court is making the case that the “inseverability” argument won’t result in the law being struck down in court, which implies that ObamaCare will stand when it comes time for the Court to make a final ruling.

Article Citations
  1. Supreme Court Signals Obamacare Will Stand.

Author: Thomas DeMichele

Thomas DeMichele is the head writer and founder of,, and other websites. He has been in the health insurance and healthcare information field since 2012. is a...

Leave a comment

We'll never share your email with anyone else.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

ObamaCareFacts is a free informational site. It's privately owned, and is not owned, operated, or endorsed by the US federal government or state governments. Our contributors have over a decade of experience writing about health insurance. However, we do not offer professional official legal, tax, or medical advice. See: Legal Information and Cookie Policy. For more on our company, learn About or Contact us.